Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Thursday, June 16, 2016

Cavium Buys QLogic (Storage, Networking Merger)

Another semiconductor merger

"Cavium Inc. will take on Broadcom, Intel and Mellanox in storage and networking with its billion-dollar acquisition of Qlogic Corp. The deal teams one of the semiconductor’s fastest growing companies with one just starting to emerge from a decline.

The acquisition adds Qlogic’s Fibre Channel and Ethernet controllers and boards to Cavium’s line up of communications, security and general-purpose processors, positioning Cavium as more of a full-line supplier to data centers. "

Other developments in networking chips-  Stanford Professor’s Startup Plans Novel Networking Chips.

Additional information on recent semiconductor mergers and acquisitions and China efforts- Update:China 2015/2016 Semiconductor Mergers, Acquisitions


Ron
Insightful, timely, and accurate semiconductor consulting.
Semiconductor information and news at - http://www.maltiel-consulting.com/





Cavium Buys QLogic for $1B

Deal expands vendor of data center chips
6/15/2016 07:15 PM EDT 

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Chinese $80 Billion Fabless IC

Latest survey of Top fabless semiconductor IC shows the result of a large effort by China to increase the number of IC companies (see below).

 Between 2009 and 2014 the number of Chinese fabless IC companies in top 50 increased from one (HiSilicon) to nine (HiSilicon, Spreadtrum, Datang, Nari Smart Chip, CIDC,  ZTE, Rockchip, RDA, Allwinner) .

"In 2014, the Chinese government described new semiconductor industry programs that will utilize investment by both the Chinese national government ($19.5 billion) and local government and private equity investors ($97.4 billion).”


Already "Chinese fabless IC suppliers held 8% of the top 50 fabless IC market ($80.5 billion) in 2014 and currently hold twice as much top 50 fabless IC market share as the European and Japanese companies combined! Nineteen U.S. companies were represented among the top 50 fabless suppliers in 2014, and they accounted for 64% of the total top 50 fabless company IC sales.  In 2014, Japan held less than 1%”

Ron
Insightful, timely, and accurate semiconductor consulting.
Semiconductor information and news at - 
http://www.maltiel-consulting.com/



China Charts New Course in Targeting Worldwide IC Industry—Fabless!

January 08, 2015

Chinese companies held 9 of the top 50 spots in the 2014 fabless IC company ranking, up from 1 in 2009.

Later this month, IC Insights’ will release the 2015 edition of The McClean Report, which includes a ranking of the top 50 fabless IC suppliers for 2014.

China’s ambitious late-1990s plan to create numerous high-volume indigenous IC manufacturers in the pure-play foundry segment did not come to fruition, but the Chinese government is still very serious about keeping China and Chinese IC suppliers relevant in the future IC industry.  In 2014, the Chinese government described new semiconductor industry programs that will utilize investment by both the Chinese national government ($19.5 billion) and local government and private equity investors ($97.4 billion).  IC Insights believes that these outlays have to potential to significantly change the future IC supplier landscape.

As Chinese IC design houses continue to advance, IC Insights expects an increasing number of China-headquartered companies to move up in the ranking of top fabless IC suppliers.  As shown in Figure 1, there were nine Chinese companies among the top-50 fabless companies in 2014 as compared to only one company in 2009.

In total, the Chinese fabless IC suppliers held 8% of the top 50 fabless IC market ($80.5 billion) in 2014 and currently hold twice as much top 50 fabless IC marketshare as the European and Japanese companies combined! Nineteen U.S. companies were represented among the top 50 fabless suppliers in 2014, and they accounted for 64% of the total top 50 fabless company IC sales.  In 2014, Japan held less than 1% and the “other” countries (e.g., South Korea, Singapore, etc.) represented only 6% of the market held by the top 50 fabless IC suppliers.

Although its original plan of establishing numerous large indigenous IC manufacturers in China was not successful, it is obvious that the Chinese government still intends to create a dynamic environment in the China-based IC industry, including placing additional emphasis on establishing new fabless IC suppliers.  IC Insights believes that the Chinese government’s commitment to creating a more powerful Chinese presence in the future IC industry is alive and well and should be taken seriously.


                       
Figure 1


More details on the 2014 top 50 fabless IC suppliers and China’s future role in the IC industry will be provided in The 2015 McClean Report.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Samsung, Apple, Xiaomi and China

Samsung face challenge due to lost business of Apple’s iPhones chips on one side (see October 2012 blog - Apple Cutting Out Samsung Chips )

While on the other side Samsung is squeezed by the rise of local cell phone vendors in china such as Xiaomi, Coolpad, Huawei, Lenovo, and ZTE (see Jan 2013 blog - Apples' Cook in China (MediaTek Impact). In addition see today's introduction of Xiaomi launches MIUI 6, makes Android look more like iOS 7

More on the fast rise of Xiaomi that "in the smartphone market in one of the world's biggest markets, research firm Canalys has revealed that Xiaomi was the market leader in its home territory of China, jumping ahead of Samsung for the first time in Q2 2014.
In the three months to the end of June, Xiaomi held a 14% market share in China with Samsung, Lenovo and CoolPad all trailing with 12% of the market while Huawei creeped into fifth spot with an 11% market share.


While it is not surprising to see Xiaomi at the top of the charts, the speed it has happened is surprising. In the first quarter of 2014, Samsung held an 18% market share while Xiaomi held just over 10%."  

Samsung respond by introducing a smartphone for china mobile as detailed in the article below.

Ron
Insightful, timely, and accurate semiconductor consulting.
Semiconductor information and news at - 
http://www.maltiel-consulting.com/






Samsung Launches Galaxy Win Pro Smartphone for China Mobile Powered by Marvell's ARMADA Mobile PXA1088 Quad-Core Platform 

February 18, 2014, 8:06 a.m. ET


Marvell's field-proven unified multi-core 3G mobile platform solution enables Samsung's latest world phone, the Galaxy Win Pro, to serve China Mobile's vast subscriber base with global WCDMA roaming capability

SANTA CLARA, Calif., Feb. 18, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Marvell (Nasdaq: MRVL) today announced the launch of the Galaxy Win Pro Smartphone for China Mobile powered by Marvell's ARMADA(R) Mobile PXA1088 Quad-Core Platform. Marvell's unified multi-core 3G mobile platform solution enables Samsung's Galaxy Win Pro, to serve China Mobile's vast subscriber base with global WCDMA roaming capability. The ARMADA Mobile PXA1088 single-chip platform is designed to drive high-quality and high-performance affordable solutions for mobile devices, furthering the "Smart Life and Smart Lifestyle." The Samsung Galaxy Win Pro is designed for China Mobile's expansive customer base and supports Global System for Mobile (GSM) and Time Division-Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access (TD-SCDMA) Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) to enable customers to have seamless Internet access regardless of location. With the Samsung Galaxy Win Pro, traveling is made easy for China Mobile's subscribers since they do not have to carry or lease extra 3G phones for global roaming with WCDMA/HSPA+.

"I am very proud to see the launch of Samsung's Galaxy Win Pro, quad-core-based mass-market smartphone for the world's largest mobile operator, China Mobile. Samsung's global leadership in delivering such affordable mobile devices with outstanding performance has enriched the lives of billions of consumers around the world through better communication and education," said Weili Dai, President and Co-Founder of Marvell. "I am very proud of our close collaboration with all key partners in the mobile ecosystem in driving the 'Smart Life and Smart Lifestyle.' I am very thankful to Samsung for their collaboration and dedication and thankful to Marvell's global teams of talented engineers for the passion, innovation and tireless effort to the successful launch of this great Galaxy smartphone."

The Samsung Galaxy Win Pro is a TD-SCDMA/GSM and W-CDMA/GSM dual-mode design that uses Marvell's all-in-one unified mobile computing platform, including wireless modem and RF transceiver that provide 3G world phone support. This enables the Samsung Galaxy Win Pro to be the choice of China Mobile's subscribers who needs to travel overseas. In addition to Marvell's ARMADA Mobile PXA1088, the Galaxy Win Pro also features the latest Marvell's RF839 3G radio transceiver, Marvell's advanced Avastar(R) 88W8777 IEEE802.11n Wi-Fi connectivity, and L2000 GPS. It also features a 4.5-inch qHD high resolution display, a 5MP camera and 8GB MLC storage with 1GB LPDDR2 memory.

About the Marvell ARMADA Mobile PXA1088:
The Marvell PXA1088 is a highly integrated quad-core application and communications mobile System-on-Chip (SoC) designed to provide high-performance, low-power mobile computing; support for all global broadband 3G standards, enabling seamless global roaming; and the latest wireless connectivity technology. Marvell's PXA1088 platform incorporates the performance of a quad-core ARM Cortex-A7 with Marvell's mature and field-proven cellular modem, including support for High Speed Packet Access Plus (HSPA+), Time Division High Speed Packet Access Plus (TD-HSPA+) and Enhanced Data for GSM Environment (EDGE). The PXA1088 enables a breakthrough end user experience for multimedia and gaming applications with universal connectivity. Marvell's complete mobile platform solution includes Marvell's advanced Avastar 88W8777 WLAN + Bluetooth 4.0 + FM single-chip SoC and the 88L2000 GNSS Hybrid Location Processor, and an integrated power management and audio codec IC. Marvell's unified mobile platform, includes the PXA986, PXA988, PXA1088 and PXA1088LTE, thus enabling easy migration from dual-core to quad-core solutions and support for TD-SCDMA, WCDMA and LTE.

Friday, November 15, 2013

China and 2013 Semiconductor Sales

Based on IC Insight's recent report of 2013 Semiconductor (see below), growth of cell phone sales in China brought Mediatek to the second place in growth ranking of the top 20 semiconductor suppliers. The list includes foundries (TSMC, GlobalFoundries, and UMC) and five fabless companies. IC foundries are included in the top-20 semiconductor supplier.

 
See Smartphone: MediaTek Overtaking Qulacomm
 

"Mediatek is expected to rank 16, up from 22 in last year's list, with smartphone application processor shipments nearly doubling to 200 million up from 108 million last year. The company "is experiencing extremely strong demand for its devices in the booming low-end smartphone business in China and other Asia-Pacific locations."

Micron and Hynix growth benefited from the consolidation of the semiconductor fabs. They were also able to increase their growth for the cell phone market outside of the developed world.

Ron
Insightful, timely, and accurate semiconductor consulting.
Semiconductor information and news at -
http://www.maltiel-consulting.com/







IC Insights Expects Big Changes to 2013 Top 20 Semi Supplier Ranking


SK Hynix, MediaTek, Micron, and Qualcomm each forecast to show ≥30% year-over-year growth.

 Later this month, IC Insights’ November Update to the 2013 McClean Report will show a preliminary ranking of the top 25 semiconductor suppliers in 2013.  A preview of the top 20 companies is listed in Figure 1.  The top 20 worldwide semiconductor (IC and O-S-D—optoelectronic, discrete, and sensor) sales leaders forecast for 2013 include nine suppliers headquartered in the U.S., three in Japan, three in Europe, three in Taiwan, and two in South Korea.

 The top-20 ranking includes three pure-play foundries (TSMC, GlobalFoundries, and UMC) and five fabless companies. IC foundries are included in the top-20 semiconductor supplier ranking because IC Insights has always viewed the ranking as a top supplier list, not as a marketshare ranking, and realizes that in some cases semiconductor sales are double counted.  With many of our clients being vendors to the semiconductor industry (supplying equipment, chemicals, gases, etc.), excluding large IC manufacturers like the foundries would leave significant “holes” in the list of top semiconductor suppliers.  Overall, the list shown in Figure 1 provides a guideline to identify which companies are the leading semiconductor suppliers, whether they are IDMs, fabless companies, or foundries. Excluding the foundries of TSMC, GlobalFoundries, and UMC, from the top-20 ranking would bring Fujitsu ($3,524 million), Marvell ($3,205 million), and Sharp ($3,078 million) into the 18th, 19th, and 20th positions, respectively.

 There are numerous changes expected within the top-20 semiconductor ranking in 2013 as compared to the top 20 ranking of 2012.  Some of the companies forecast to rise in the ranking include SK Hynix, which, despite a significant fire and production set-back at its largest memory fab in China, is taking full advantage of the surge in the DRAM market this year and is expected to move up three places and into the top 5.  Also, Broadcom is forecast to edge into the top 10, Micron is expected to move up two spots, spurred by its acquisition of Elpida in 3Q13, and MediaTek is forecast to jump up six positions to 16th place and into the top-20 ranking for the first time.  MediaTek is experiencing extremely strong demand for its devices in the booming low-end smartphone business in China and other Asia-Pacific locations.  In fact, MediaTek expects its application processor shipments for smartphones to reach over 200 million units this year, about double the 108 million units the company shipped in 2012.

 In contrast to the companies moving up in the ranking, Fujitsu is expected to drop five places to fall out of the top-20 ranking in 2013, going from being ranked 16th in 2012 to 21st this year (the company sold its analog and MCU business to Spansion in August of this year).  Renesas is another “casualty” expected in the top-20 ranking and is forecast to fall to 11th place in 2013 from the 7th position it held in 2012.

 
Figure 1

In total, the top 20 semiconductor companies’ sales are forecast to increase by 7% in 2013 as compared to 2012, which would be two points better than the 5% forecast for the total worldwide semiconductor market this year.  It is expected to take total semiconductor sales of over $3.7 billion to make the top-20 ranking in 2013.

As shown in Figure 2, there is expected to be a 60-percentage-point range of growth rates among the worldwide top 20 semiconductor suppliers in 2013 (from +44% for SK Hynix to -16% for Sony).  The continued success of the fabless/foundry business model and the strong growth of the memory market (especially the 29% DRAM market surge) this year is evident when examining the nine top-20 semiconductor suppliers that are forecast to log higher growth than the total worldwide semiconductor market (5%).  As shown, the top nine performers in 2013 are forecast to include three memory companies (SK Hynix, Micron, and Toshiba), two fabless companies (MediaTek and Qualcomm), and two pure-play foundries (TSMC and GlobalFoundries).

 
Figure 2 
Figure 2 illustrates that the two top-20 ranked companies that are forecast to register double-digit sales declines in 2013 are headquartered in Japan (Renesas and Sony).  As previously mentioned, Japan-based Fujitsu is also expected to register a double-digit decline (-15%) in 2013 and drop out of the top 20 ranking this year.  However, it should be noted that the conversion of Japanese company semiconductor sales from yen to U.S. dollars, at 96.96 yen per dollar forecast for 2013 versus the 79.70 yen per dollar rate in 2012, is expected to have a significant impact on the sales figures for the Japanese companies.  Using a constant 2012 U.S. dollar versus Japanese yen exchange rate for 2013, the forecasted 2013 semiconductor sales increases of Sony, Fujitsu, and Renesas would be 4%, 3%, and 2%, respectively.

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Smartphone Dark Horse: Huawei

China is a vast market for smartphones. Apple is doing a good job of dominating the high end of the smart phone market there. While at the low end of Androids' phones Huawei is advancing fast.

From the article below:
"This year, the company expects to triple its smartphone sales to 60 million units, in part by taking a bigger chunk of the U.S. market...

Late last year, Huawei was No. 7 in smartphones. Now it may be No. 3—and is pushing hard to sell its inexpensive handsets in the U.S"

I wonder how many flash memory chips do their cell phone use.

Ron



The New Smartphone Powerhouse: Huawei

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-07-19/the-new-smartphone-powerhouse-huawei
By Peter Burrows on July 19, 2012

Sales of smartphones are booming, though very few phone makers have been rejoicing. Nokia (NOK) and Research In Motion (RIMM) have seen their once-formidable businesses collapse into a mess of red ink and layoffs. HTC’s sales have tumbled. Once-proud Motorola Mobility has been acquired by Google (GOOG). Sony (SNE) and LG Electronics (066570) are confirmed also-rans.




Feasting on this wreckage are, of course, Apple (AAPL) and Samsung Electronics (005930), which between them have 54 percent of the global market. The other big winner: Huawei Technologies. A company many Americans haven’t even heard of may well have passed Nokia last quarter to become the third-largest smartphone maker, according to Horace Dediu, founder of equity research firm Asymco. That’s up from No. 7 at the end of last year. “They’re the guys that don’t get a lot of respect because they’re not big in the U.S.,” says Dediu. “But they’re looking at big numbers.”



After it was founded in 1987 by civil engineer Ren Zhengfei, Huawei quickly became China’s high-tech success story by selling telecom gear to phone companies, routinely beating rivals such as Alcatel-Lucent (ALU), Ericsson (ERIC), and Cisco Systems (CSCO) with good-enough products and great prices. Only in the mid-2000s did it start making cell phones. The Shenzhen-based company’s inexpensive, often unbranded models gained traction in China, the Middle East, and Africa.



Huawei kept this low-cost approach as it got serious about smartphones in 2009. The company didn’t try to build its own software operating system like Apple, Microsoft (MSFT), Nokia, or RIM. It used Android. And unlike Samsung, HTC, or Motorola, it didn’t try to differentiate Google’s mobile software with its own tweaks. “Huawei just slapped Android on some hardware and shipped it,” says ABI Research analyst Michael Morgan.



This year, the company expects to triple its smartphone sales to 60 million units, in part by taking a bigger chunk of the U.S. market. Until now, it’s sold handsets costing less than $200 to carriers such as MetroPCS and Cricket that offer pay-as-you-go plans, mostly to lower-income consumers. Last November it landed a deal with a top-tier U.S. carrier when AT&T (T) started selling Huawei’s Impulse phone for $29. On July 11, T-Mobile announced that Huawei would be building two models in the carrier’s MyTouch line of handsets. “We essentially made the market for affordable smartphones,” says William Plummer, Huawei’s U.S. vice president for external affairs. “We’re in a good position because we’ve established ourselves as a trusted partner to carriers.”



Not completely trusted, however. On Capitol Hill, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has been investigating whether efforts by Huawei and ZTE, another fast-growing Chinese telecom equipment and phone maker, to sell to U.S. carriers present a security risk, because the companies may have ties to the Chinese government. The Australian government has banned Huawei from bidding on a national broadband project. Congress has asked the State Department to investigate whether Huawei illegally exported embargoed technologies to Iran. For years, industry insiders have believed that Huawei has access to low-interest loans from the government. Huawei spokesman Francis Hopkins says the company is cooperating with the congressional investigation, gets no favorable loans from the Chinese government, and denies wrongdoing in Iran. It definitely has benefited from huge domestic broadband buildouts, says Jeff Heynen, an analyst with consulting firm Infonetics.



Succeeding in smartphones is not optional for Huawei if it wants to remain a fast-growing company. Its $23 billion-a-year telecom equipment business grew only 3.5 percent in 2011, before tumbling due to the slowdown in China’s economy this year, says Heynen. The company reorganized last year to create a separate Huawei Devices unit to drive what executives say is the company’s best growth opportunity. The division also makes laptop modems and other less-sexy gizmos.



Huawei’s growth rate may make it a plausible challenger to Samsung in smartphone sales, says Asymco’s Dediu. He argues that the Korean giant has prospered largely because of vertical integration; it makes many of the chips and screens that go into its devices. Yet he doubts Samsung has built up enough brand loyalty to withstand a much cheaper alternative. “Let’s not forget that Samsung itself was No. 4 or 5 just a few years ago,” says Dediu. “Samsung ought to be looking over its shoulder.”



As smartphones evolve from novelty technology into just another gadget, Huawei will be well positioned to benefit. “Their devices don’t have to have jet packs to do 90 percent of what most people need,” says Morgan of ABI Research. “The market is coming to them.”





The bottom line: Late last year, Huawei was No. 7 in smartphones. Now it may be No. 3—and is pushing hard to sell its inexpensive handsets in the U.S.



Thursday, June 21, 2012

Status of China's Fabless Model

The large demand for smartphone chips in China will cause local Chinese design houses to grow faster in the next few years.


Ron












source: IC Insights






Is China's fabless model sustainable?

http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4375636/Is-China-fabless-model-sustainable?pageNumber=1
Junko Yoshida

6/19/2012 9:11 AM EDT



How many U.S. design engineers can name, say, the top 10 Chinese chip vendors destined to become their fierce competitors in three years from now? BEIJING -- Let’s face it. China’s IC industry still lacks its own superstars – equivalent to Intel, Qualcomm or Broadcom in the West – in terms of the scale, reach and quality these brands possess on the global market.

To belabor the point, how many U.S. design engineers can name, say, the top 10 Chinese chip vendors destined to become their fierce competitors in three years from now? The question is tough because Chinese fabless companies, while growing fast, are still small. Many also remain faceless.

In contrast, a Chinese executive based in Beijing, speaking with ee Times, rattled off Spreadtrum, RDA Microelectronics, GalaxyCore and GigaDevice as his “top four” picks among local fabless companies likely to become key players in the smartphone IC ecosystem. The executive, heading up a U.S.-based chip company’s R&D team, believes that will happen not within the decade, but in just a few years.


Is he right?
EE Times has talked to several movers and shakers in China’s semiconductor industry in recent weeks. While our investigation is still in progress, we’ll be reporting our ongoing findings in a two-part series. First, we examine the state of the Chinese fabless industry -- covering how they’ve gotten to where they are today. In part two, we discuss what Chinese semiconductor companies must do in order to cross the chasm – from local heroes in China to power players on the global stage.



On one hand, some multinationals like Synopsys (EDA vendor), VeriSilicon (“Design-Lite” service company) and ARM (IP supplier) are well positioned to leverage local engineering resources to respond to Chinese fabless companies’ always pressing (and almost impatient) need to get ahead more quickly.

On the other, Chinese startups, still in early days, lack a portfolio of their own IPs. Consequently, “they tend to compete on price with similar products in the same application fields,” observed Jian-Yue Pan, corporate vice president, Asia Pacific region of Synopsys.


Meanwhile, some China fabless are coming up with fresh ideas (i.e.Apexone), operating with an incredible work ethic and directing a fanatical focus on customer service (i.e. Awinic). Companies like RDA, Spreadtrum and Rockchip are growing like gangbusters.


It’s important to note that there is nothing monolithic about China or China’s fabless companies. Over the last two decades, a number of Chinese chip companies – some well known in the West – had distinct trajectories, with a full array of ups and downs. Some disappeared and others thrived, their fates depending on when each company was born, how it was managed, and whether the ecosystem in China was sufficient to spur growth.

Synopsys’ Pan turns out to be as good a student and observer of the Chinese semiconductor industry as any, since he has lived through the rise of the industry over the last 17 years while working at Synopsys in China.

Pan isn’t a returnee – like many other China fabless executives today who were born in China and came to the United States for graduate degrees, before going home again to help nurture the Chinese industry.

Pan is home-grown. He has worked his entire professional life in China, rather than in Silicon Valley, after graduation from the nation’s elite Tsinghua University in early the 1990’s.


Chinese fabless companies have come a long way


In the interview, Pan said, “A lot of things have happened. Over the last 17 years, we saw the rise of the Korean chip industry, and the decline of Japanese companies.” To illustrate the rise of the Chinese semiconductor industry, Pan divided the last 17 years in three periods: “incubation” (1995 – 2001); “breakthrough” (2001 – 2007); and “acceleration” (2007 – 2012).
Incubation

During the incubation period, virtually all the companies taking part in the Chinese semiconductor industry were state-owned. They were largely pushed, prompted and nurtured by Chinese government’s industrial policy and technology transfers from other countries including the United States, Europe and Japan.
During this period, the total revenue of the Chinese IC design houses was “less than $100 million,” according to Pan.


Nonetheless, several important milestones helped pave the way for the birth of the Chinese semiconductor industry. They include: the completion of technology transfer between Lucent and Huajing in 1997, allowing Huajing—located in Wuxi in Jiangsu Province—to start producing 6-inch CMOS wafers with 0.9 micron design rules. By 1999, SDRAM production started on the 8-inch wafer fab at HHNEC (Hua Hong NEC Electronics Co.) using a 0.35 micron process technology. These were days when few indigenous fabless companies existed in China. These fabs had to depend on the international semiconductor community for consumption, as well as for technical support.


But the most significant milestone of all during this period, according to Pan, was the emergence of the Chinese central government’s “Policy No. 18.” Put in place in July, 2000, the directive was a top-down order to “encourage the development of the IC industry in China,” explained Pan. Under Policy 18, the government offered favorable tax treatment to domestically produced IC chips, while providing heavy government investment in infrastructure, education and basic research.

As a result, seven state-owned incubation centers for IC design sprang up, with Synopsys coming out as one of the big beneficiaries. It turns out that the seven state-owned IC design centers standardized their design flow environment on Synopsys tools, making Synopsys the government’s favored tool designer.


Breakthrough

The following six years (2001 – 2007) is when the Chinese semiconductor industry saw a number of breakthroughs, fueled by the growth of the Chinese economy and adherence to Policy 18. Pan observed that in 2000, there were fewer than 100 fabless companies in China. But 2003, more than 450 fabless had vendors popped up. Also emerging was China’s strategic mimicry of the Silicon Valley model, using stock-based compensation to incentivize managers and engineers in high-tech companies.


In 2003, Hangzhou Silan Microelectronics Co., Ltd, popularly known as Silan Corporation, became the first IC vendor on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Silan successfully made an IPO, initiated with 26 million shares of series A-stock
By 2006, both Vimicro International Corporation and Actions Semiconductor had gone through a rigorous IPO process and got listed in Nasdaq. In 2007, Spreadtrum went public and joined the Nasdaq club.


Acceleration

Pan now sees the Chinese semiconductor industry in its third phase, where everything is accelerating. There are five more Chinese companies on a wait-list to go public on Nasdaq.As of 2011, China had close to 500 fabless chip companies, with total revenue last year at “give or take, close to $10 billion,” Pan said.

Where do they go from here?
Over the last three years, “some startups – including GigaDevice, GalaxyCore, RDA and Rockchip – have grown very fast,” according to Datong Chen, co-founder and managing director of West Summit Capital in Beijing. There is no dispute about that
The question, however, is how sustainable it is for these companies to continue to grow so rapidly. How many more years can Chinese companies continuously keep gross margin low and perpetually work harder in order to bring down the cost of their products in hopes of beating out foreign competition?
In the top 20 fabless IC companies’ ranking for 2011 (put together by IC Insights), only two from China, HiSilicon and Spreadtrum, showed up.
Top 20 fabless IC companies in 201




source: IC Insights

Datong has experienced firsthand the rise of the Chinese chip industry, as he was the co-founder and CTO of Spreadtrum Communications. Prior to Spreadtrum, Datong was the co-founder and senior vice present for Omnivision, a leading developer of CMOS imaging sensor.

For Chinese fabless companies to sustain current growth, Datong said, “They need a bigger platform.” By “platform,” he means, “Money, a larger market size, and a bigger customer base.” Then, he added, “Of course, it’s better if they do IPOs – because that will allow them to get fair market value, it would make it much easier for them to do acquisitions, and they will get more trust from the market.”
The potential for Chinese fabless companies to reap greater rewards are already here, according to Allen Wu, president of ARM China. ARM-based SoCs, designed by Chinese fabless companies and shipped globally, jumped from 30 million units in 2007 to 615 million units in 2011.
And yet, Wayne Dai, president and CEO of VeriSilion, calls the Chinese semiconductor industry a “no-man’s-land of fabless companies.” He explained that most of the 400+ China fabless companies are living through a 'no man’s land,' which he describes "an inflection point for a start up’s life cycle.

In his view, "[Chinese fabless companies] are too big to be small, but too small to be big." In other words, "If they can’t continue to grow, evolving into firms that dramatically change their marketplace or define a new category, they have to either stay small or sell to a larger company. Otherwise, they are going out of business within the next two years."
In essence, most Chinese fabless companies remain too stubbornly small to exploit the market’s size. There lies the conundrum.
In part two of this article, we’ll discuss prescriptions—what steps Chinese fabless companies must take, and conversely, what actions multinationals should take to survive among all those Chinese go-getters.

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Exclusive: Google, Amazon, and Microsoft Swarm China for Network Gear

About  10 years ago Cisco was the largest buyer of Flash memory. Is the recent demand for cloud storage, data centers, and servers a major source of demand for Flash and DRAM memories.

Ron Maltiel

Exclusive: Google, Amazon, and Microsoft Swarm China for Network Gear
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/03/google-microsoft-network-gear/
By Cade Metz Email Author March 30, 2012 | 6:36 am |

J.R. Rivers once built networking hardware at Google. Now he helps web
giants buy their networking hardware directly from China and Taiwan.
Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired
Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Facebook buy more networking hardware
than practically anyone else on earth. After all, these are the giants
of the internet. But at the same time, they're buying less and less
gear from Cisco, HP, Juniper, and the rest of the world's largest
networking vendors. It's an irony that could lead to a major shift in
the worldwide hardware market.
Over the past few years, the giants of the web have changed the way
they purchase tens of thousands of the network switches inside the
massive data centers driving their online services, quietly moving
away from U.S.-based sellers to buy cheaper gear in bulk straight from
China and Taiwan. According to J.R. Rivers — an ex-Google engineer —
Google has built its own gear in tandem with varous Asian
manufacturers for several years, and according to James Liao — who
spent two years selling hardware for Taiwan-based manufacturer Quanta
— Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft are purchasing at least some of
their networking switches from Asian firms as well.

"My biggest customers were these big data center [companies], so I
know all of them pretty well," Liao says. "They all have different
ways of solving their networking problems, but they have all moved
away from big networking companies like Cisco or Juniper or [the
Dell-owned] Force10."
The move away from U.S. network equipment stalwarts is one of the
best-kept secrets in Silicon Valley. Some web giants consider their
networking hardware strategy a competitive advantage that must be
hidden from rivals. Others just don't want to anger their business
partners in the hardware sector by talking about the shift. But cloud
computing is an arms race. The biggest web companies on earth are
competing to see who can deliver their services to the most people in
the shortest amount of time at the lowest cost. And the cheapest arms
come straight from Asia.

J.R. Rivers is one of the arms dealers. He runs a company called
Cumulus Networks that helps the giants of the web — and other outfits
— buy their networking hardware directly from "original design
manufacturers," or ODMs, in China and Taiwan. And he's worked in this
world for an awfully long time. He's one of the Google engineers who
secretly designed a new breed of networking switch for the company's
data centers, the massive computing facilities that drive its search
engine and the rest of its web services.
Rivers joined Google in October 2005, after five ears as a
distinguished engineer at Cisco, the company that dominated the
worldwide market for networking gear. At the time, Google was still
connecting its servers using standard networking switches from the
likes of Cisco and Force10 Networks. But these mass-market switches
just didn't suit Google's unusually large operation.
"When Google looked at their network, they need high-bandwidth
connections between their servers and they wanted to be able to manage
things — at scale," Rivers says. "With the traditional enterprise
networking vendors, they just couldn't get there. The cost was too
high, and the systems were too closed to be manageable on a network of
that size."
So Google drew up its own designs — working alongside manufacturers in
Taiwan and China — and cut the Ciscos and the Force10s out of the
equation. The Ciscos and the Force10s build their gear with many of
those same manufacturers. Google removed the middlemen.
The search giant does much the same with its servers, buying
custom-built machines straight from Asia rather than going through
traditional sellers such as Dell and HP. Because its web services were
used by such an enormous number of people, Google faced all sorts of
data center problems no one else faced — problems of power and space
as well as cost and logistics. So it built all sorts of custom
hardware to solve those problems.
"They all have different ways of solving their networking problems,
but they have all moved away from big networking companies like Cisco
or Juniper or Force10″
Now, the other giants of the web are running into the same issues, and
they too are going straight to Asia for hardware. Following closely
behind are companies that run large internal server farms, including
financial houses and healthcare outfits.
As J.R. Rivers serves this market with Cumulus Networks, James Liao is
doing much the same thing with a second startup called Pica8, offering
networking gear that comes straight from the ODMs. Pica8 is a spinoff
of Liao's former employer, Quanta — one of the companies that
manufactured Google's original networking switches, according to
Rivers.
According to Liao, tens of thousands of switches are already being
sold by the Asian ODMs directly to the likes of Amazon, Facebook, and
Microsoft. And that doesn't include the gear Google has bought over
the past seven years. "This is just the beginning," Liao says,
pointing out that these buyers operate the biggest data centers on
earth. These companies account for only a part of the
$7-billion-a-year Ethernet switch market, but as more and more outfits
move their operations into the proverbial cloud, the influence of
these web giants will only grow.
Liao estimates that Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and others have bought
Asian network switches spanning "millions" of network ports — i.e.,
connections to servers — and he guesses that in 2011, about 60 percent
of these ports provided 10Gigabit Ethernet connections. According to
Matthias Machowinski — a directing analyst with Infonetics, a research
firm that tracks the networking market — the official market for
10Gigabit Ethernet spanned about 9 million ports in 2011.
J.R. Rivers declines to name the companies he's working with at
Cumulus Networks, but he confirms that some of the big-name web
outfits are already buying networking switches from ODMs in Asia. In
all likelihood, these companies are also purchasing switches from
other sources as well. Cisco says it has a "significant presence and
mindshare" in the big-name web market, and Juniper says it has a
relationship with all of the top five web players, pointing out that
data center networks require more gear than just switches. But the
market is on the move.
The Future of 'Web Giant 3.0′
"We are continuously exploring new infrastructure technologies that
may evolve further efficiencies across our portfolio. We normally have
discussions with ODMs and large and small OEMs to better understand
their capabilities and evaluate their products," reads a statement
sent to Wired by a Microsoft spokesperson and attributed to Dileep
Bhandarkar, a distinguished engineer who oversees the data centers
driving Microsoft's online services. But the statement did not
specifically address the purchase of networking gear.
Amazon did not respond to a request for comment about its hardware
practices, and a Google spokeswoman sent us a one-sentence statement:
"We work with a variety of vendors to manufacture the equipment we use
in our data centers," she said. These two companies — particularly
Google — are rather tightlipped about their data center practices.
"This supply chain change is nascent. But it's the most exciting thing
going on in Silicon Valley right now"
Facebook declined to discuss how it purchases networking gear, but in
response to secretive approach of Amazon and Google, the company has
openly discussed some of its other practices, and it has actually
shared its server and data center designs with the rest of the world.
It purchases its servers directly from Quanta and Wistron, another
Taiwanese ODM.
Martin Casado — the chief technology officier of a third Silicon
Valley networking startup, Nicira — confirms that the hardware market
is shifting to Asia. Offering a software platform that virtualizes
networking gear in much the same way that VMware virtualized servers,
Nicira helps some of the big web players build their networks. The
Nicira platform was designed specifically for companies along the
lines of Google that want to use cheap commodity switches to
physically construct their network but then do all the complex
management in software.
"If you're building web giant 3.0, you can go to Quanta in Taiwan and
buy crates … of switches," he says. "This supply chain change is
nascent. But it's the most exciting thing going on in Silicon Valley
right now."

Google Goes to Asia
According to J.R. Rivers, Google began work on its custom-built
networking switches in early 2005, before he arrived at the company.
In the beginning, River says, Google worked in tandem with Quanta and
other Asian ODMs. But eventually, he says, Google took all the
engineering work in house. Basically, he says, the company wasn't
happy with the work the ODMs did at the time. Google engineers would
design the switches, and then they would bring the completed designs
to contract manufacturers in Asia, outfits along the lines of Foxconn,
the Asian company that builds Apple's iPhones and iPads.
Google has never discussed its practices publicly, but rumors have
long indicated that the company built its networking switches in this
way. In 2007, research analyst Andrew Schmitt noticed that certain
manufacturers were producing enormous numbers of chips for 10Gigabit
Ethernet switches but that the switches themselves weren't actually
turning up on the market. "It didn't make sense to me why someone
would be building so much of a given component if there were no
customers that could use it," he says. "What I was able to determine
is that Google was purchasing switch chips straight from the comment
suppler."
"It didn't make sense to me why someone would be building so much of a
given component if there were no customers that could use it"
The switches Google was building typically sat at the top of a rack of
servers in the data center, connecting the servers to the rest of the
network. As Juniper points out, this is only part of the networking
hardware used in the data, but it's a large part.
Google, Rivers says, is a unique company. It has the wherewithal and
the talent to built its own switches, but other companies may not be
up to the task. With Cumulus Networks, J.R. Rivers and his partner,
Nolan Leake, are trying to grease the wheels. "[The other web players]
are trying to figure out what the best model is, and that's one of the
reasons we started up," Rivers says. "Google is unique in its
willingness to build something just because they know it can be done.
Most other people see a risk/reward trade-off. We seek to minimize
that risk."
Though Rivers declined to name the ODMs his company is working with,
he says that these are well-known manufacturers in Taiwan and China.
"We've been working for the last year on opening up a supply chain for
traditional ODMs who want to sell the hardware on the open market for
whoever wants to buy," he says. "For the buyers, there can be some
very meaningful cost savings. Companies like Cisco and Force10 are
just buying from these same ODMs and marking things up. Now, you can
go directly to the people who manufacture it."
This has become possible in recent years, Rivers says, because the
ODMs have slowly acquired more and more engineering talent. You can
now buy commodity gear from more places. "Networking is opening up
much like the transition from mainframes to RISC machines and later to
x86 servers," says Rivers' partner, Nolan Leake. "We're moving towards
a world where customers have more control over their destiny."
'The Arms Dealer'
Before spinning Pica8 out of Quanta, James Liao was already selling
similar networking switches to the big web players. Nicira's Martin
Casado refers to James Liao as "the arms dealer" in this networking
revolution. "He's the conduit between the rest of the world and
Quanta. He knows this space better than anyone," Casado says. "And I
love him because he talks like he's part of organized crime."
From July 2009 to September 2011, Liao was the senior director at
Quanta in charge of product strategy for network switching and data
center products. He was based in Silicon Valley, and his job was to
serve the giants of the web. He declines to go into much detail about
how these companies acquire their hardware, but he's unequivocal in
saying that the other big companies — Amazon, Microsoft, and Facebook
— are now following Google's lead in going directly to Asia for their
gear.

James Liao. Photo: Courtesy Liao
Networking switches, he says, have become a commodity. "They all use
the same chips. They have to same latency. They have the same
bandwidth. This is a clear signal that the hardware platform is
commoditizing," he says. "You can actually find a lot of [ODM]
suppliers that have the capability to manufacturer and design this
kind of platform."
Like Cumulus Network, Liao's new venture, Pica8, brings this low-cost
networking hardware to a much larger market. In the past, one of the
problems with buying directly from the ODMs is that you had build your
own software to drive your switches. But Pica8 aims to provide
software for those companies that don't want to build their own. The
company has open sourced an early version of this software — known as
Picos — and it plans to open source a more extensive version of the
platform next month.
"We give you the hardware and the software," Liao says. "If you take
our platform and compare it to Cisco, the protocol features we provide
and the hardware performance are all in the same range. The only
difference is that the price is 40 percent to 60 percent lower."
Though Pica8 spun off of Quanta, Liao says that the company will also
sell switches from other ODMs. But he declined to name them. But he
does say Pica8 is selling gear to Japanese telecom giant NTT and
Baidu, the company that dominates the Chinese search engine market.
Matthias Machowinski, of research firm Infonetics, says he is "very
much aware" of this trend, though he adds that it is extremely hard to
track. He says that the big web giants account for only a part of the
overall switch market — "the number of customers that might choose to
go down this route are very limited. Today, you can count them on one
hand, and maybe over the next two years, two hands might be enough" —
but he also acknowledges that as businesses move their applications
onto services such as Amazon EC2 and Microsoft Azure — rather than
running stuff in their own data centers — these web giants will
account for an even larger part of the switch market.

Like Server, Like Switch
This shadow networking market is a repeat of what happened in the
server world. Years ago, Google started building its own servers in
tandem with the Asian ODMs, and other web giants followed. These
companies are looking to save cost, but they're also looking to reduce
their power consumption, customizing machines so they're far more
efficient than their mass-market brethren.
In 2009, Google revealed some server designs it produced several years
before. But, as with networking practices, the company says very
little about its server gear. Amazon operates in much the same way.
But Facebook had taken a different approach. Last year, after building
its own data centers and working with various manufacturers to build
its own servers, the social networking giant open sourced these
designs to the rest of the world, hoping that others across the
industry can help improve those designs, buy more hardware based on
the designs, and ultimately drive down the price of the hardware.
"It's kind like buying couches. If you buy one, you go to a retail
store. If you buy 10,000 couches, you go straight to the factory"
This Open Compute Project already has several other big-name backers,
including Texas-based cloud computing outfit Rackspace and Japan's
NTT. And it doesn't stop at data centers and servers. Last month,
Frank Frankovsky — the ex-Dell man who oversees hardware design at
Facebook — told us that the company is in the midst of building its
own storage hardware and that these designs will be open sourced in
early May.
In these cases, Facebook and Amazon and Google and others bypassed
"original equipment manufacturers," or OEMs, such as Dell and HP. The
servers sold by the likes of HP and Dell are actually manufactured by
those same ODMs in Taiwan and China.
James Liao, of Pica8 and formerly of Quanta, does not work with
servers. But he says that it's common knowledge that — like Google and
Facebook — Amazon purchases at least some of its servers from ODMs in
Asia. "For servers, Facebook and Amazon are taking almost exactly the
same approach," he says. "Amazon also has some very high power
designers, but they don't do the design themselves. They come up with
a certain architecture and they tell the ODMs: 'This is my vision.
These are the goals. And I want help designing the hardware.'"
Now, Liao says, this same sort of thing is happening with, well,
everything. "All of the data center hardware is bought this way," Liao
says. "You can refer to Facebook as an example, where one of the big
projects inside the Open Compute effort is storage. Even the storage
side is being commoditized. Servers, storage, and networking — all of
them are going to this way."

Nolan Leake and J.R. Rivers of Cumulus Networks. Photo: Jon Snyder/Wired
Howard Wu — the president of greater China for Joyent, an Amazon-like
cloud computing outfit based in San Francisco — agrees. "If you're a
small business and you're going to buy five servers, you're going to
Dell or HP, because of the support services. But if you're a data
center operator and you're going to buy 10,000 servers, you're going
straight [to the ODMs]," he says. "It's kind like buying couches. If
you buy one, you go to a retail store. If you buy 10,000 couches, you
go straight to the factory."
That said, Joyent is not yet buying its gear from the ODMs.
"We are definitely in talks, but it hasn't actually happened yet," he
says. "We have other contractual obligations right now." The market
has not completely shifted to Asia. It's moving in stages. These web
companies have many suppliers — that's just good for businesses — and
in some cases, they're still buying hardware from the traditional
players — perhaps because they still have contracts in place.
Facebook, for instance, is still buying some servers from Dell and HP.
And Amazon is still buying custom servers from Rackable, a stateside
manufacturer, and apparently other outfits based here in America.
The hardware supply chain is vast and varied. But it's consolidating.
Now that they have the engineering talent, J.R. Rivers says, the ODMs
are transforming into OEMs. "The market is maturing to the point where
anyone can buy directly from ODMs," he says. "You don't have to be
Google."