The table in the
article below documents Qualcomm direction in response to Apple 64 bit
processor (see in September 2013 iPhone 5s Teardown ).
"Today
Qualcomm is rounding out its 64-bit family with the Snapdragon 808 and 810.
Like the previous 64-bit announcements (Snapdragon 410, 610 and 615),
the 808 and 810 leverage ARM's own CPU IP in lieu of a Qualcomm designed
microarchitecture. We'll finally hear about Qualcomm's own custom 64-bit
architecture later this year, but it's clear that all 64-bit Snapdragon SoCs
shipping in 2014 (and early 2015) will use ARM CPU IP."
A key issue for
Qualcomm is "Qualcomm's sharing the roadmap to its premium Snapdragon
chipset lineup much earlier than it usually does; the 810 and 808 won't be
available on devices until the first half of 2015. This is largely due to
competitive pressure: MediaTek, Intel and NVIDIA are going big by pushing out
chips with 64-bit support and, in some cases, eight cores. Given how fast the
industry is iterating, it's not hard to see that Qualcomm -- which currently
dominates much of the mobile chipset market -- doesn't want to lose momentum or
popularity." Qualcomm's 2015 chips may make you regret getting a new phone
this year
See more from
September 2013 on iPhone 5s Teardown ,
and from July
2013 Smartphone: MediaTek Overtaking Qulacomm
While Qualcomm grew
31% last year, Media Tek already grew 36% semiconductor vendors ranking - Top Semiconductor Ranking for 2013
Ron
Insightful, timely,
and accurate semiconductor consulting.
Semiconductor information and news at - http://www.maltiel-consulting.com/
Semiconductor information and news at - http://www.maltiel-consulting.com/
by Anand Lal
Shimpi on April 7, 2014
Today Qualcomm is rounding out its 64-bit family with the
Snapdragon 808 and 810. Like the previous 64-bit announcements (Snapdragon 410, 610 and 615), the 808 and 810 leverage ARM's own CPU IP in lieu
of a Qualcomm designed microarchitecture. We'll finally hear about Qualcomm's
own custom 64-bit architecture later this year, but it's clear that all 64-bit
Snapdragon SoCs shipping in 2014 (and early 2015) will use ARM CPU IP.
While the 410, 610 and 615 all use ARM Cortex A53 cores (simply varying the number of
cores and operating frequency), the 808 and 810 move to a big.LITTLE design
with a combination of Cortex A53s and Cortex A57s. The latter is an evolution
of the Cortex A15, offering anywhere from a 25 - 55% increase in IPC over the
A15. The substantial increase in performance comes at around a 20% increase in
power consumption at 28nm. Thankfully both the Snapdragon 808 and 810 will be
built at 20nm, which should help offset some of the power increase.
Qualcomm's 64-bit
Lineup
|
|||||||
|
Snapdragon 810
|
Snapdragon 808
|
Snapdragon 615
|
Snapdragon 610
|
Snapdragon 410
|
||
Internal
Model Number
|
MSM8994
|
MSM8992
|
MSM8936
|
MSM8939
|
MSM8916
|
||
Manufacturing
Process
|
20nm
|
20nm
|
28nm LP
|
28nm LP
|
28nm LP
|
||
CPU
|
4 x ARM Cortex A57 + 4 x ARM Cortex A53 (big.LITTLE)
|
2 x ARM Cortex A57 + 4 x ARM Cortex A53 (big.LITTLE)
|
8 x ARM Cortex A53
|
4 x ARM Cortex A53
|
4 x ARM Cortex A53
|
||
ISA
|
32/64-bit ARMv8-A
|
32/64-bit ARMv8-A
|
32/64-bit ARMv8-A
|
32/64-bit ARMv8-A
|
32/64-bit ARMv8-A
|
||
GPU
|
Adreno 430
|
Adreno 418
|
Adreno 405
|
Adreno 405
|
Adreno 306
|
||
H.265
Decode
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
||
H.265
Encode
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
||
Memory
Interface
|
2 x 32-bit LPDDR4-1600
|
2 x 32-bit LPDDR3-933
|
2 x 32-bit LPDDR3-800
|
2 x 32-bit LPDDR3-800
|
2 x 32-bit LPDDR2/3-533
|
||
Integrated
Modem
|
9x35 core, LTE Category 6/7, DC-HSPA+, DS-DA
|
9x35 core, LTE Category 6/7, DC-HSPA+, DS-DA
|
9x25 core, LTE Category 4, DC-HSPA+, DS-DA
|
9x25 core, LTE Category 4, DC-HSPA+, DS-DA
|
9x25 core, LTE Category 4, DC-HSPA+, DS-DA
|
||
Integrated
WiFi
|
-
|
-
|
Qualcomm VIVE 802.11ac 1-stream
|
Qualcomm VIVE 802.11ac 1-stream
|
Qualcomm VIVE 802.11ac 1-stream
|
||
eMMC
Interface
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
4.5
|
4.5
|
4.5
|
||
Camera
ISP
|
14-bit dual-ISP
|
12-bit dual-ISP
|
?
|
?
|
?
|
||
Shipping
in Devices
|
1H 2015
|
1H 2015
|
Q4 2014
|
Q4 2014
|
Q3 2014
|
The Snapdragon 808
features four Cortex A53s and two Cortex A57s, while the 810 moves to four of
each. In both cases all six/eight cores can be active at once (Global Task
Scheduling). The designs are divided into two discrete CPU clusters (one for
the A53s and one for the A57s). Within a cluster all of the cores have to
operate at the same frequency (a change from previous Snapdragon designs), but
each cluster can operate at a different frequency (which makes sense given the
different frequency targets for these two core types). Qualcomm isn't talking
about cache sizes at this point, but I'm guessing we won't see anything as
cool/exotic as a large shared cache between the two clusters. Although these
are vanilla ARM designs, Qualcomm will be using its own optimized cells and
libraries, which may translate into better power/performance compared to a
truly off-the-shelf design.
The CPU is only one piece of the puzzle as the rest of the
parts of these SoCs get upgraded as well. The Snapdragon 808 will use an Adreno
418 GPU, while the 810 gets an Adreno 430. I have no idea what either of those
actually means in terms of architecture unfortunately (Qualcomm remains the
sole tier 1 SoC vendor to refuse to publicly disclose meaningful architectural details about its GPUs). In terms of graphics performance, the
Adreno 418 is apparently 20% faster than the Adreno 330, and the Adreno 430 is
30% faster than the Adreno 420 (100% faster in GPGPU performance). Note that
the Adreno 420 itself is something like 40% faster than Adreno 330, which would
make Adreno 430 over 80% faster than the Adreno 330 we have in Snapdragon
800/801 today.
Also on the video
side: both SoCs boast dedicated HEVC/H.265 decode hardware. Only the Snapdragon
810 has a hardware HEVC encoder however. The 810 can support up to two 4Kx2K
displays (1 x 60Hz + 1 x 30Hz), while the 808 supports a maximum primary
display resolution of 2560 x 1600.
The 808/810 also
feature upgraded ISPs, although once again details are limited. The 810 gets an
upgraded 14-bit dual-ISP design, while the 808 (and below?) still use a 12-bit
ISP. Qualcomm claims up to 1.2GPixels/s of throughput, putting ISP clock at 600MHz
and offering a 20% increase in ISP throughput compared to the Snapdragon 805.
The Snapdragon 808
features a 64-bit wide LPDDR3-933 interface (1866MHz data rate, 15GB/s memory
bandwidth). The 810 on the other hand features a 64-bit wide LPDDR4-1600 interface
(3200MHz data rate, 25.6GB/s memory bandwidth). The difference in memory
interface prevents the 808 and 810 from being pin-compatible. Despite the
similarities otherwise, the 808 and 810 are two distinct pieces of silicon -
the 808 isn't a harvested 810.
Both SoCs have a
MDM9x35 derived LTE Category 6/7 modem. The SoCs feature essentially the same
modem core as a 9x35 discrete modem, but with one exception: Qualcomm enabled
support for 3 carrier aggregation LTE (up from 2). The discrete 9x35 modem implementation
can aggregate up to two 20MHz LTE carriers in order to reach Cat 6 LTE's
300Mbps peak download rate. The 808/810, on the other hand, can combine up to
three 20MHz LTE carriers (although you'll likely see 3x CA used with narrower
channels, e.g. 20MHz + 5MHz + 5MHz or 20MHz + 10MHz + 10MHz).
Enabling 3x LTE CA
requires two RF transceiver front ends: Qualcomm's WTR3925 and WTR3905. The
WTR3925 is a single chip, 2x CA RF transceiver and you need the WTR3905 to add
support for combining another carrier. Category 7 LTE is also supported by the
hardware (100Mbps uplink), however due to operator readiness Qualcomm will be
promoting the design primarily as category 6.
There's no
integrated WiFi in either SoC. Qualcomm expects anyone implementing one of
these designs to want to opt for a 2-stream, discrete solution such as the
QCA6174.
Qualcomm refers to
both designs as "multi-billion transistor" chips. I really hope we'll
get to the point of actual disclosure of things like die sizes and transistor
counts sooner rather than later (the die shot above is inaccurate).
The Snapdragon 808
is going to arrive as a successor to the 800/801, while the 810 sits above it
in the stack (with a cost structure similar to the 805). We'll see some
"advanced packaging" used in these designs. Both will be available in
a PoP configuration, supporting up to 4GB of RAM in a stack. Based on everything
above, it's safe to say that these designs are going to be a substantial
upgrade over what Qualcomm offers today.
Unlike the rest of
the 64-bit Snapdragon family, the 808 and 810 likely won't show up in devices
until the first half of 2015 (410 devices will arrive in Q3 2014, while 610/615
will hit in Q4). The 810 will come first (and show up roughly two quarters
after the Snapdragon 805, which will show up two quarters after the recently
released 801). The 808 will follow shortly thereafter. This likely means we
won't see Qualcomm's own 64-bit CPU microarchitecture show up in products until
the second half of next year.
With the Snapdragon
808 and 810, Qualcomm rounds out almost all of its 64-bit lineup. The sole
exception is the 200 series, but my guess is the pressure to move to 64-bit
isn't quite as high down there.
What's interesting to me is just how quickly Qualcomm has
shifted from not having any 64-bit silicon on its roadmap to a nearly complete
product stack. Qualcomm appeared to stumble a bit after Apple's unexpected 64-bit Cyclone announcement last fall. Leaked
roadmaps pointed to a 32-bit only future in 2014 prior to the introduction of
Apple's A7. By the end of 2013 however, Qualcomm had quickly added its first
64-bit ARMv8 based SoC to the roadmap (Snapdragon 410). Now here we are, just
over six months since the release of iPhone 5s and Qualcomm's 64-bit product
stack seems complete. It'll still be roughly a year before all of these
products are shipping, but if this was indeed an unexpected detour I really
think the big story is just how quickly Qualcomm can move.
I don't know of any other silicon player that can move and ship this
quickly. Whatever efficiencies and discipline Qualcomm has internally, I feel
like that's the bigger threat to competing SoC vendors, not the modem IP.
No comments:
Post a Comment